PARIS: A stunningly intact 220-million-year-old turtle fossil with a shell on its front, but not its back, appears to have settled a long-simmering debate over reptile evolution: how did the turtle get its shell?
In a study published today in the British journal Nature, scientists report the discovery of a missing-link species – Odontochelys semitestacea ('toothed, half-shell turtle') – whose outer shell emerged directly from the ribs and backbone and not from the skin, as some have argued.
The find also suggests that turtles originated in water rather than on land, and pushes back the group's first known appearance on Earth by some 10 million years.
in the absence of hard evidence, scientists have argued since the early 1800s over exactly how this reptilian mobile home came into being.
One school of thought said the shell evolved from skin
The competing theory said that the plastron formed first
followed by an outgrowth and widening of the ribs and backbone to form the hard-shell carapace