clipped from: www.flickriver.com   
clipped from: danzarrella.com   
A small observational study done by Robert Provine in 2000 showed that humor has little to do with laughter, rather it is our social setting that influences our giggles:


Only 10% to 20% of the laughter episodes we witnessed followed anything joke-like. Even the most humorous of the 1,200 comments that preceded laughter weren’t necessarily howlers: “You don’t have to drink, just buy us drinks!” and “Was that before or after I took my clothes off?.” being two of my favorites. This suggests that the critical stimulus for laughter is another person, not a joke…
clipped from: www.flickriver.com   
clipped from: danzarrella.com   
However happy we may feel, laughter is a signal we send to others and it virtually disappears when we lack an audience.
clipped from: www.flickriver.com   
clipped from: danzarrella.com   
Another curious feature of the social nature of laughter is its contagiousness.

In 1962 a small town in what is now Tanzania fell victim to

the “Tanganyika Laughter Epidemic“.
clipped from: www.flickriver.com   
clipped from: danzarrella.com   
10,000 adult men and women and teens of both sexes caught the “disease” after coming in contact with an infected person.

1963 report,
clipped from: www.flickriver.com